{{short description|Statistical principle about ratio of effects to causes}} {{for|the optimal allocation of resources|Pareto efficiency}} {{specific|date=August 2022}} [[File:Pareto principle.png|thumb|The Pareto principle may apply to fundraising, i.e., 20% of the donors contributing towards 80% of the total.]]

The '''Pareto principle''' (also known as the '''80:20 rule''', the '''law of the vital few''' and the '''principle of factor sparsity'''{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/03/business/03juran.html|title=Joseph Juran, 103, Pioneer in Quality Control, Dies|last1=Bunkley|first1=Nick|date=March 3, 2008|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=25 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170906182706/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/03/business/03juran.html|archive-date=September 6, 2017}}{{cite journal|last1=Box|first1=George E.P.|last2=Meyer|first2=R. Daniel|date=1986|title=An Analysis for Unreplicated Fractional Factorials|journal=Technometrics|volume=28|issue=1|pages=11–18|doi=10.1080/00401706.1986.10488093}}) states that, for many outcomes, roughly 80% of consequences come from 20% of causes (the "vital few").

In 1941, [[management consultant]] [[Joseph M. Juran]] developed the concept in the context of quality control and improvement after reading the works of Italian [[sociologist]] and [[economist]] [[Vilfredo Pareto]], who wrote in 1906 about the 80:20 connection while teaching at the [[University of Lausanne]].{{Cite book|last=Pareto|first=Vilfredo|title=Cours d'Économie Politique (in two volumes)|publisher=F. Rouge (Lausanne) & F. Pichon (Paris)|date=1896–1897}} [https://archive.org/details/fp-0148-1 Volume 1] [https://web.archive.org/web/20130531151249/http://www.institutcoppet.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Cours-déconomie-politique-Tome-II-Vilfredo-Pareto.pdf Volume 2] In his first work, ''Cours d'économie politique'', Pareto showed that approximately 80% of the land in the [[Kingdom of Italy]] was owned by 20% of the population. The Pareto principle is only tangentially related to the concept of [[Pareto efficiency]].

Mathematically, the 80:20 rule is associated with a [[power law]] distribution (also known as a [[Pareto distribution]]). In many natural phenomena certain features are distributed according to power law statistics.{{cite journal|url=https://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/0412/0412004v3.pdf|title=Power laws, Pareto Distributions, and Zipf's law|journal=Contemporary Physics|volume=46|issue=5|pages=323–351|last=Newman|first=MEJ|access-date=10 April 2011|bibcode=2005ConPh..46..323N|year=2005|arxiv=cond-mat/0412004|doi=10.1080/00107510500052444|s2cid=202719165}} It is an [[adage]] of [[business management]] that "80% of sales come from 20% of [[Client (business)|clients]]."{{Cite news|last=Marshall|first=Perry|url=https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/229294|title=The 80/20 Rule of Sales: How to Find Your Best Customers|date=2013-10-09|work=Entrepreneur|access-date=2018-01-05|language=en}}

== History == In 1941, [[Joseph M. Juran]], a Romanian-born American engineer, came across the work of Italian polymath [[Vilfredo Pareto]]. Pareto noted that approximately 80% of Italy's land was owned by 20% of the population.{{citation|title=''Translation of'' Manuale di economia politica ("Manual of political economy") |first1=Vilfredo|last1=Pareto|first2=Alfred N.|last2=Page|publisher=A.M. Kelley|year=1971|isbn=978-0-678-00881-2}} Juran applied the approximation that 80% of problems stem from 20% of the causes to the field of quality management. Later during his career, Juran preferred to describe this as "the vital few and the useful many", to dissuade from an interpretation of the principle as the contribution of the 80% being without value.{{Cite web|date=2019-03-12|title=Pareto Principle (80/20 Rule) & Pareto Analysis Guide|url=https://www.juran.com/blog/a-guide-to-the-pareto-principle-80-20-rule-pareto-analysis/|access-date=2021-02-27|website=Juran|language=en-US}}

== Mathematical explanation == The demonstration of the Pareto principle is explained by a large proportion of process variation being associated with a small proportion of process variables. This is a special case of the wider phenomenon of [[Pareto distribution]]s. If the [[Pareto index]] '''α''', which is one of the parameters characterizing a Pareto distribution, is chosen as '''α''' = log45 ≈ 1.16, then one has 80% of effects coming from 20% of causes.{{Citation |last=Dunford |title=The Pareto Principle |url=https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10026.1/14054/TPSS-2014-Vol7n1_140-148Dunford.pdf |journal=The Plymouth Student Scientist |year=2014 |access-date=2022-10-28 |archive-date=2022-01-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220122121809/https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10026.1/14054/TPSS-2014-Vol7n1_140-148Dunford.pdf |url-status=bot: unknown }}. Internet Archive of 22.10.2022.

The term 80:20 is only a shorthand for the general principle at work. In individual cases, the distribution could be nearer to 90:5 or 70:30. Note that there is no need for the two numbers to add up to the number 100, as they are measures of different things. The Pareto principle is an illustration of a "[[power law]]" relationship, which also occurs in phenomena such as [[bush fire]]s and earthquakes.{{Citation |last=Bak |first=Per |title=How Nature Works: the science of self-organized criticality |page=89 |year=1999 |publisher=Springer |isbn=0-387-94791-4 |author-link=Per Bak}} [[Benoit Mandelbrot]] offered an explanation for this pattern in the field of economics and social science based on income dynamics in population. According to his reasoning, above a certain minimum income threshold, the probability of an individual's income increasing or decreasing by a fixed proportion (e.g., doubling) remains constant across all income levels. As a consequence, the ratio of individuals earning a given income x to those earning half that amount x/2 remains the same, regardless of the absolute value of x. This scale-invariant property is a defining feature of [[power-law distribution]]s. Because it is self-similar over a wide range of magnitudes, it produces outcomes completely different from [[Normal distribution|Normal or Gaussian distribution]] phenomena. The occurrence probability of rare extreme (or catastrophic) events showing power-law distribution may be of several orders of magnitude greater than that associated with other usual models, such as, e.g., Gaussian or exponential. This fact explains the frequent breakdowns of sophisticated financial instruments, which are modeled on the assumption that a Gaussian relationship is appropriate to something like stock price movements.{{Citation |last=Taleb |first=Nassim |title=The Black Swan |pages=229–252, 274–285 |year=2007 |author-link=Nassim Taleb |title-link=The Black Swan (Taleb book)}}

=== Derivation of ''α'' for the 80:20 rule ===

As an example, consider the [[Pareto distribution]] of wealth. The (Type 1) Pareto distribution is defined as:

p(x)= \begin{cases} \frac{\alpha,x_\mathrm{m}^\alpha}{x^{\alpha+1}} & x \ge x_\mathrm{m}, \ 0 & x < x_\mathrm{m}. \end{cases}

where x_m is the scale parameter and \alpha is the shape parameter. The ''x'' variable will represent wealth in (e.g.) dollars, while ''p(x)dx'' will represent the fraction of the population with wealth between ''x'' and ''x+dx'' dollars. Defining ''N'' as the total population, the number of people owning between ''x'' and ''x+dx'' dollars will be N p(x) dx and they will own a total of N x,p(x) dx dollars.

The total number of people with wealth between x_a and x_b dollars will then be:

:N\int_{x_a}^{x_b} p(x)dx

and they will be holding:

:N \int_{x_a}^{x_b} x,p(x)dx

dollars of the total wealth. The total wealth is:

:N \int_{x_m}^\infty x,p(x)dx

dollars. The 80% of the population on the low end of the wealth scale will be those owning between x_m and x_o dollars so that:

:\frac{N\int_{x_m}^{x_o} p(x)dx}{N\int_{x_m}^\infty p(x)dx} = 1-\left(\frac{x_m}{x_o}\right)^\alpha= 0.8

and if they hold 20% of the wealth then:

:\frac{N\int_{x_m}^{x_o} x,p(x)dx}{N\int_{x_m}^\infty x,p(x)dx} = 1-\left(\frac{x_m}{x_o}\right)^{\alpha-1}= 0.2

Solving the above two equations for \alpha and x_o yields \alpha=\log_4(5) and x_o=4, x_m.

=== Gini coefficient and Hoover index === Using the "''A'':''B''" notation (for example, 0.8:0.2) and with ''A'' + ''B'' = 1, [[Income inequality metrics|inequality measures]] like the [[Gini index]] (G) ''and'' the [[Hoover index]] (H) can be computed. In this case both are the same:

: H=G=|2A-1|=|1-2B|=\frac{1}{2\alpha-1}

which in the 80:20 case yields \mathrm{G}\approx 0.756

: A:B = \left( \frac{1+H} 2 \right): \left( \frac{1-H} 2 \right)

== Analysis == [[File:Pareto analysis.svg|thumb|A Pareto analysis in a diagram showing which cause should be addressed first]]

Pareto analysis is a formal technique useful where many possible courses of action are competing for attention. In essence, the problem-solver estimates the benefit delivered by each action, then selects a number of the most effective actions that deliver a total benefit reasonably close to the maximal possible one.

Pareto analysis is a creative way of looking at causes of problems because it helps stimulate thinking and organize thoughts. However, it can be limited by its exclusion of possibly important problems which may be small initially, but will grow with time. It should be combined with other analytical tools such as [[failure mode and effects analysis]] and [[fault tree analysis]] for example.{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}}

This technique helps to identify the top portion of causes that need to be addressed to resolve the majority of problems. Once the predominant causes are identified, then tools like the [[Ishikawa diagram]] (also called Fish-bone Analysis) can be used to identify the root causes of the problems. While it is common to refer to pareto as "80:20" rule, under the assumption that, in all situations, 20% of causes determine 80% of problems, this ratio is merely a convenient rule of thumb and is not, nor should it be considered, an immutable law of nature.

The application of the Pareto analysis in risk management allows management to focus on those risks that have the most impact on the project.David Litten, [http://www.pmhut.com/project-risk-and-risk-management Project Risk and Risk Management], ''Retrieved May 16, 2010''

Steps to identify the important causes using 80:20 rule:{{cite web|title=Pareto Analysis|url=http://erc.msh.org/quality/pstools/pspareto.cfm|accessdate=12 January 2012|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120208180732/http://erc.msh.org/quality/pstools/pspareto.cfm|archivedate=8 February 2012}}

Form a frequency of occurrences as a percentage

Arrange the rows in decreasing order of importance of the causes (i.e., the most important cause first)

Add a cumulative percentage column to the table, then plot the information

Plot (#1) a curve with causes on ''x''- and cumulative percentage on ''y''-axis

Plot (#2) a bar graph with causes on ''x''- and percent frequency on ''y''-axis

Draw a horizontal dotted line at 80% from the ''y''-axis to intersect the curve. Then draw a vertical dotted line from the point of intersection to the ''x''-axis. The vertical dotted line separates the important causes (on the left) and trivial causes (on the right)

Explicitly review the chart to ensure that causes for at least 80% of the problems are captured

== Applications ==

=== Economics === Pareto's observation was in connection with [[Concentration of land ownership|population and wealth]]. Pareto noticed that approximately 80% of Italy's land was owned by 20% of the population. He then carried out surveys on a variety of other countries and found to his surprise that a similar distribution applied.{{citation needed|date=August 2022}}

A chart that demonstrated the effect appeared in the 1992 [[United Nations Development Programme|United Nations Development Program]] Report, which showed that the richest 20% of the world's population receives 82.7% of the world's income.{{citation|author=United Nations Development Program|title=1992 Human Development Report|year=1992|location=New York|publisher=Oxford University Press}} However, among nations, the [[Gini index]] shows that wealth distributions vary substantially around this norm.{{cite web|title=Poverty, Growth, and Inequality over the Next 50 Years|first=Evan|last=Hillebrand|publisher=FAO, United Nations – Economic and Social Development Department|date=June 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171020065423/ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/012/ak968e/ak968e00.pdf|archive-date=2017-10-20|url-status=dead|url=ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/012/ak968e/ak968e00.pdf}}

{| class="wikitable" |+ Distribution of world GDP, 1989{{citation|url=http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr1992/chapters/|title=Human Development Report 1992, Chapter 3|access-date=2007-07-08}} |- ! scope="col" | Quintile of population ! scope="col" | Income |- | Richest 20% | 82.70% |- | Second 20% | 11.75% |- | Third 20% | 2.30% |- | Fourth 20% | 1.85% |- | Poorest 20% | 1.40% |}

The principle also holds within the tails of the distribution. The physicist Victor Yakovenko of the [[University of Maryland, College Park]] and AC Silva analyzed income data from the US Internal Revenue Service from 1983 to 2001 and found that the [[income distribution]] of the richest 1–3% of the population also follows Pareto's principle.{{Citation|last1=Yakovenko|first1=Victor M.|title=Two-class Structure of Income Distribution in the USA: Exponential Bulk and Power-law Tail|date=2005|work=Econophysics of Wealth Distributions: Econophys-Kolkata I|pages=15–23|editor-last=Chatterjee|editor-first=Arnab|series=New Economic Windows|publisher=Springer Milan|language=en|doi=10.1007/88-470-0389-x_2|isbn=978-88-470-0389-7|last2=Silva|first2=A. Christian|editor2-last=Yarlagadda|editor2-first=Sudhakar|editor3-last=Chakrabarti|editor3-first=Bikas K.}}

In ''Talent: How to Identify Energizers, Creatives, and Winners Around the World'', economist [[Tyler Cowen]] and entrepreneur [[Daniel Gross (entrepreneur)|Daniel Gross]] suggest that the Pareto Principle can be applied to the role of the 20% most talented individuals in generating the majority of [[economic growth]].[[Paris Aéroport]], ''Paris Vous Aime Magazine'', No 13, avril-may-juin 2023, p. 71 A [[supermarket]] industry maxim states that 20% of products provide 80% of profits.{{Cite magazine |last=Goldberg |first=Cheryl J. |date=1984-09-04 |title=Milk, Butter, Cheese, and PCs |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vQDibG12bVcC&pg=PA204 |access-date=November 15, 2025 |magazine=PC |pages=204-215 |volume=3 |issue=17}} According to the ''New York Times'' in 1988, many [[video rental shop]]s reported that 80% of revenue came from 20% of videotapes (although rarely rented classics such as ''[[Gone with the Wind (film)|Gone with the Wind]]'' must be stocked to appear to have a good selection).{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1988/05/01/business/a-tight-squeeze-at-video-stores.html?pagewanted=2|url-status=live|title=A Tight Squeeze at Video Stores|last=Kleinfield|first=N. R.|date=1988-05-01|work=The New York Times|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150525080808/http://www.nytimes.com/1988/05/01/business/a-tight-squeeze-at-video-stores.html?pagewanted=2|archive-date=2015-05-25|url-access=subscription|issn=0362-4331|access-date=2024-03-07}}

=== Computing === In [[computer science]] the Pareto principle can be applied to [[optimization (computer science)|optimization]] efforts.{{citation|first1=M.|last1=Gen|first2=R.|last2=Cheng|title=Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Optimization|location=New York|publisher=Wiley|year=2002}} For example, [[Microsoft]] noted that by fixing the top 20% of the most-reported bugs, 80% of the related errors and crashes in a given system would be eliminated.{{citation|url=http://www.crn.com/news/security/18821726/microsofts-ceo-80-20-rule-applies-to-bugs-not-just-features.htm|title=Microsoft's CEO: 80–20 Rule Applies To Bugs, Not Just Features|first=Paula|last=Rooney|date=October 3, 2002|publisher=ChannelWeb}} Lowell Arthur expressed that "20% of the code has 80% of the errors. Find them, fix them!"Pressman, Roger S. (2010). Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach (7th ed.). Boston, Mass: McGraw-Hill, 2010. {{ISBN|978-0-07-337597-7}}.

=== Occupational health and safety === [[Occupational health and safety]] professionals use the Pareto principle to underline the importance of hazard prioritization. Assuming 20% of the hazards account for 80% of the injuries, and by categorizing hazards, safety professionals can target those 20% of the hazards that cause 80% of the injuries or accidents. Alternatively, if hazards are addressed in random order, a safety professional is more likely to fix one of the 80% of hazards that account only for some fraction of the remaining 20% of injuries.{{cite book |last=Woodcock |first=Kathryn |title=Safety Evaluation Techniques |year=2010 |publisher=Ryerson University |location=Toronto, ON |pages=86 |url=http://www.ryerson.ca/woodcock/ |archive-date=2021-03-01 |access-date=2012-01-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210301094738/https://www.ryerson.ca/woodcock/ |url-status=dead }}

Aside from ensuring efficient accident prevention practices, the Pareto principle also ensures hazards are addressed in an economical order, because the technique ensures the utilized resources are best used to prevent the most accidents.{{cite web|title=Introduction to Risk-based Decision-Making |url= http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/cg5211/docs/RBDM_Files/PDF/RBDM_Guidelines/Volume%202/Volume%202-Chapter%206.pdf |work=USCG Safety Program |publisher= United States Coast Guard |access-date= 14 January 2012}}

=== Engineering and quality control === The Pareto principle provides the basis for the [[Pareto chart]], one of the key tools used in [[total quality management|total quality control]] and [[Six Sigma]] techniques. The Pareto principle serves as a baseline for [[time management|ABC-analysis]] and XYZ-analysis, widely used in [[logistics]] and procurement for the purpose of optimizing stock of goods, as well as costs of keeping and replenishing that stock.{{harvtxt|Rushton|Oxley|Croucher|2000}}, pp. 107–108. In engineering control theory, such as for electromechanical energy converters, the 80:20 principle applies to optimization efforts.

The remarkable success of statistically based searches for root causes is based upon a combination of an empirical principle and mathematical logic. The empirical principle is usually known as the Pareto principle. Juran, Joseph M., Frank M. Gryna, and Richard S. Bingham. Quality control handbook. Vol. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974. With regard to variation causality, this principle states that there is a non-random distribution of the slopes of the numerous (theoretically infinite) terms in the general equation.

All of the terms are independent of each other by definition. Interdependent factors appear as multiplication terms. The Pareto principle states that the effect of the dominant term is very much greater than the second-largest effect term, which in turn is very much greater than the third, and so on. Shainin, Richard D. “Strategies for Technical Problem Solving.” 1992, Quality Engineering, 5:3, 433-448 There is no explanation for this phenomenon; that is why we refer to it as an empirical principle.

The mathematical logic is known as the square-root-of-the-sum-of-the-squares axiom. This states that the variation caused by the steepest slope must be squared, and then the result added to the square of the variation caused by the second-steepest slope, and so on. The total observed variation is then the square root of the total sum of the variation caused by individual slopes squared. This derives from the probability density function for multiple variables or the multivariate distribution (we are treating each term as an independent variable).

The combination of the Pareto principle and the square-root-of-the-sum-of-the-squares axiom means that the strongest term in the general equation totally dominates the observed variation of effect. Thus, the strongest term will dominate the data collected for hypothesis testing.

In the systems science discipline, [[Joshua M. Epstein]] and [[Robert Axtell]] created an [[Agent-based social simulation|agent-based simulation]] model called [[Sugarscape]], from a [[Decentralised system|decentralized modeling]] approach, based on individual behavior rules defined for each agent in the economy. Wealth distribution and Pareto's 80:20 principle emerged in their results, which suggests the principle is a collective consequence of these individual rules.{{Citation|last1=Epstein|first1=Joshua|title=Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom-Up|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xXvelSs2caQC|page=208|year=1996|publisher=[[MIT Press]]|isbn=0-262-55025-3|last2=Axtell|first2=Robert}}

=== Health and social outcomes === In 2009, the [[Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality]] said 20% of patients incurred 80% of healthcare expenses due to chronic conditions.{{cite web|url=http://www.projo.com/opinion/contributors/content/CT_weinberg27_07-27-09_HQF0P1E_v15.3f89889.html|title=Myrl Weinberg: In health-care reform, the 20-80 solution|last1=Weinberg|first1=Myrl| website=The Providence Journal|date=July 27, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090802002952/http://www.projo.com/opinion/contributors/content/CT_weinberg27_07-27-09_HQF0P1E_v15.3f89889.html|archive-date=2009-08-02}} A 2021 analysis showed unequal distribution of healthcare costs, with older patients and those with poorer health incurring more costs.{{cite web |last1=Sawyer |last2=Claxton |first1=Bradley |first2=Gary |title=How do health expenditures vary across the population? |url=https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/health-expenditures-vary-across-population/#item-discussion-of-health-spending-often-focus-on-averages-but-a-small-share-of-the-population-incurs-most-of-the-cost_2016 |website=Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker |publisher=Peterson Center on Healthcare and the Kaiser Family Foundation |access-date=13 March 2019}} The 80:20 rule has been proposed as a rule of thumb for the infection distribution in [[superspreading event]]s.{{cite journal|last1=Galvani|first1=Alison P.|last2=May|first2=Robert M.|year=2005|title=Epidemiology: Dimensions of superspreading|journal=Nature|volume=438|issue=7066|pages=293–295|doi=10.1038/438293a|pmid=16292292|bibcode=2005Natur.438..293G|pmc=7095140}} However, the degree of infectiousness has been found to be distributed continuously in the population.{{cite journal|last1=Lloyd-Smith|first1=JO|last2=Schreiber|first2=SJ|last3=Kopp|first3=PE|last4=Getz|first4=WM|year=2005|title=Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence|journal=Nature|volume=438|issue=7066|pages=355–359|doi=10.1038/nature04153|pmid=16292310|bibcode=2005Natur.438..355L|pmc=7094981}} In [[epidemic]]s with super-spreading, the majority of individuals infect relatively few [[contact tracing|secondary contacts]].

== See also ==

• {{anl|1% rule}}
• {{anl|10/90 gap}}
• {{anl|Ninety–ninety rule}}
• {{anl|Sturgeon's law}}

== References == {{Reflist}}

== Further reading ==

• {{Citation |last=Bookstein |first=Abraham |year=1990 |title=Informetric distributions, part I: Unified overview |journal=Journal of the American Society for Information Science |volume=41 |issue= 5|pages=368–375 |doi=10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199007)41:5<368::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-C }}
• {{Citation |author1=Klass, O. S. |author2=Biham, O. |author3=Levy, M. |author4=Malcai, O. |author5=Soloman, S. |year=2006 |title=The Forbes 400 and the Pareto wealth distribution |journal=Economics Letters |volume=90 |issue=2 |pages=290–295 |doi=10.1016/j.econlet.2005.08.020 }}
• {{Citation |title=Living the 80/20 Way: Work Less, Worry Less, Succeed More, Enjoy More |last=Koch |first=R. |year=2004 |publisher=Nicholas Brealey Publishing |location=London |isbn=1-85788-331-4 }}
• {{Citation |last=Reed |first=W. J. |year=2001 |title=The Pareto, Zipf and other power laws |journal=Economics Letters |volume=74 |issue=1 |pages=15–19 |doi=10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00524-9 }}
• {{Citation |doi=10.1016/0094-1190(80)90043-1 |author1=Rosen, K. T. |author2=Resnick, M. |year=1980 |title=The size distribution of cities: an examination of the Pareto law and primacy |journal=Journal of Urban Economics |volume=8 |issue= 2|pages=165–186 |url= https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9tt5c711}}
• {{citation |title=The handbook of logistics and distribution management |last1=Rushton |first1=A. |last2=Oxley|first2= J.|last3= Croucher|first3= P. |year=2000 |edition=2nd |publisher=Kogan Page |location=London |isbn=978-0-7494-3365-9 }}.

== External links == {{Commons category}}

• [https://www.fichansraj.org/post/pareto-rule-of-causes-and-consequences Pareto Principle: Rule of causes and consequences]
• [https://www.paretorule.cf/?m=1 ParetoRule.cf : Pareto Rule] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181202202708/https://www.paretorule.cf/?m=1 |date=2018-12-02 }}
• [https://www.paretorule.cf/2018/12/the-pareto-Rule.html?m=1 ParetoRule.cf : The Pareto Rule] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181202202706/https://www.paretorule.cf/2018/12/the-pareto-Rule.html?m=1 |date=2018-12-02 }}
• [http://management.about.com/cs/generalmanagement/a/Pareto081202.htm About.com: Pareto's Principle] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090213165607/http://management.about.com/cs/generalmanagement/a/Pareto081202.htm |date=2009-02-13 }}
• [https://www.simplypsychology.org/pareto-principle.html Simply Psychology: Pareto Principle (The 80-20 Rule): Examples & More]

{{Vilfredo Pareto}} {{Authority control}}

[[Category:Adages]] [[Category:Eponyms in economics]] [[Category:Problem solving methods]] [[Category:Quality management]] [[Category:Rules of thumb]] [[Category:Statistical charts and diagrams]] [[Category:Statistical laws]] [[Category:Statistical principles]] [[Category:Tails of probability distributions]] [[Category:Vilfredo Pareto]]